The Seedbed in Penitentiary Law “PENITENTIARY JUSTICE” It is conceived as a space for in-depth study and analysis of prison systems and the principles that govern the treatment and rehabilitation of prisoners. In a context where humanity, social reintegration, and respect for human rights are fundamental, this training center stands as a place to critically explore the prison regulatory framework, examine practical cases, and debate contemporary challenges in this specific area.
Comprised of students interested in the field of penitentiary law, the program aims to contribute to the development of penitentiary law, train competent future jurists, and promote an efficient penitentiary system that respects human rights.
In the Seedbed of Penitentiary Law “PENITENTIARY JUSTICE”Key topics will be addressed, such as inmate rights, prison conditions, rehabilitation and reintegration programs, and new trends in prison administration. Through the analysis of real cases and debates on jurisprudence, the program will seek to gain a comprehensive understanding of the prison situation, considering both the needs of inmates and the challenges facing the prison system.
Jurisprudential Analysis: Promote critical analysis of national and international jurisprudence, to understand the interpretation and application of the principles of penitentiary law in specific cases and in situations of legal controversy.
Training and Penitentiary Practice: Provide training and practice opportunities to members of the incubator, through visits to penitentiary centers, the preparation of improvement proposals and participation in penitentiary management simulations.
Promotion of Human Rights: Contribute to the promotion of a culture of respect for human rights in the penitentiary environment, through reflection and debate on ethical dilemmas and the dissemination of good practices in the management of penitentiary centers.
The Seedbed in Penitentiary Law “PENITENTIAL JUSTICE” is based on solid conceptual and theoretical bases of penitentiary law, which include:
These conceptual bases are fundamental for the critical analysis of the prison system, the understanding of prison principles and the promotion of impartial and effective prison management.
- González Ariza, H. (2019). The role of the penitentiary technical board, in the application of sentence replacements by the compliance judge in the accusatory criminal system. Cathedra Magazine, (10), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.37594/cathedra.n10.260
- León Alapont, J. (2022). Practical guide to prison law: (1 ed.). Wolters Kluwer Spain. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/218733
- Luengo, HJC Herrero Mejías, Ó. & Luengo Borrero, I. (2019). Criminology in the penitentiary field: (1 ed.). Delta Publications. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/227435
- Maculan, E. (2023). Penitentiary reality and restorative “utopia” in sentences for terrorism crimes: (1 ed.). Dykinson. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/232081
- Mata y Martín, R. & Montero Hernanz, T. (2021). Reintegration and prison: (ed.). JM BOSCH EDITOR. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/213861
- Nistal Burón, J. (2022). Penitentiary regulations discussed and agreed with jurisprudence: (1 ed.). Wolters Kluwer Spain. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/219231
- Pérez Rodríguez, MD (Coord.). (2012). Penitentiary legislation: (2 ed.). ICB Publishing. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/106177
- Quarta, E. (2022). Person and penitentiary law: (1 ed.). Olejnik Editions. https://051022hkx-y-https-elibro-net.umecit.metaproxy.org/es/lc/umecit/titulos/250830
- Villalobos, K. (2023). The legal regime for breastfeeding women in provisional detention or serving a conviction. Cathedra Magazine, (20), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.37594/cathedra.n20.1223
- Wellington Th., F.E. (2017). Criminalistics in higher education. Cathedra Magazine, (1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.37594/cathedra.n1.28